In these cases the defendant may be rewarded the insanity plea or actions of self defense. The court held that the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment because it was not applied fairly and uniformly.
The current population of the U. The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled. I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation.
If you do the math, that totals about 3. The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form.
Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible criminals, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried out more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years.
Also debatable on this topic is the new fronts of technology.
This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: The second advantage stated by the Affirmative claims that Innocent people will not be wrongfully killed. The remaining 11 cases represent 0.
Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The only relevant question is: Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families.
Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty. It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes to the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty.
Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible.
But in a debate of statistics and facts, they cannot be considered. The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not.
I believe that that idea should be greatly reflected upon on your part. He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished. According to the Supreme Court of the U. When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society.
The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid.
Only 23 people have been executed since that were considered innocent, although 12 of these cases have no actual evidence of innocence.
The affirmatives final statement in the advantages of their case outline states that Americans will no longer look upon death so cheaply. Then may I ask what the affirmatives plan for these inmates would be?
The reason some evidence may be inconclusive is that the death penalty often takes a while to be carried out; some prisoners sit on death row for years before being executed. The largest percentage of readers are between the ages of 35 and 44, and the majority of readers have either a college degree or a graduate degree.
This is a pure issue of morals, and is not relevant to the debate. After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional.
Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. Note that the court held capital punishment as cruel and unusual because of how it was applied, not because of the physical nature. They did not clearly state their plan and procedures for passing such a law as they plan on, and several of their issues are irrelevant.This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue.
I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the. Capital Punishment Essay: The Death Penalty and the Eighth Amendment - The Death Penalty and the Eighth Amendment Is the death penalty consistent with the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against the imposition of cruel and unusual punishments.
Therefore, a death penalty is a directive meant to serve a constitutional just and right of a wrongdoing.
The penalty does not violate any constitutional regulations such as torture. Hence, execution of an inmate under a death row is never improbable. The death penalty is a contradiction of the constitution - Assignment Example On In Assignment Sample According to the affirmitive team, the death penalty is a contradiction of the constitution.
The death penalty as currently structured and administered is morally wrong and violates the beliefs of most religions and the American constitution, a document that was implemented to protect the rights of Americans. Is The Death Penalty Constitutional Essays: OverIs The Death Penalty Constitutional Essays, Is The Death Penalty Constitutional Term Papers, Is The Death Penalty Constitutional Research Paper, Book Reports.
ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access.Download